this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
189 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

87956 readers
2512 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1394707/study-reveals-how-generative-ai-is-eroding-the-development-pathway-for-software-develope

In-depth interviews with 14 junior and senior developers in Korea reveal four structural changes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rozodru@piefed.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can also attest to this. about 2 to 3 years ago when dev houses and startups started utilizing AI I transitioned from a contract dev to a sort of glorified code reviewer/digital janitor. I saw the writing on the wall and figured my skill at code reviewing would become valuable. In hindsight that was an understatement.

Senior devs who have completely embraced AI have stagnated or regressed in their skill set. Juniors/fresh grads are just glorified prompt monkeys. NONE of these places can fix anything that the AI agents build. None of it scales. None of it can be potentially refactored. I get contracted to try to "fix" these issues and I simply tell them it can't be fixed. they need to start over and ACTUALLY build the thing from scratch with qualified and competent devs. the problem with that is they already laid off said devs or fired the ones that refused to utilize AI in their builds. And even if they wanted to hire those devs back either most have totally abandoned the field (obviously with good reason) or, and good for them, are asking for much higher pay to return.

So yes it's not going to be a problem, it currently is one. Initial builds can potentially work just fine but after that good luck, everyone is collectively screwed. There's no one coming out of school that is going to save this and the ones that could save it have said "nope, I'm done". Myself I'm retiring by the end of this year. I'm also done. I figured I'd focus on FOSS projects but even those projects are drinking the AI Kool-Aid so I'm not going to do that. the few projects I was contributing to or helped maintain I've told them I'm done. I'm just not going to touch code anymore unless it's updating my personal websites or nixos configs. that's it. I'm out.

[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is a sad situation, but those of use who still know how to actually code are going to make bank.

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

One can only dream haha

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Senior devs who have completely embraced AI have stagnated or regressed in their skill set

Means they were not senior devs to begin with, no matter how they were called by the company