this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
15 points (68.3% liked)

science

28872 readers
543 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
laverabe@lemmy.world
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
laverabe@lemmy.zip
15
Neuroscience’s Case Against Free Will Is Falling Apart (youtu.be)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In 1983 Benjamin Libet found that brain activity predicts your movements before you are aware of deciding to move. The result has been reproduced many times, and it has been used ever since to argue that free will is an illusion. Three new papers say the measurements were fine but the interpretation was not. Let's take a look.

Sources:

Action fluency and conscious intention: being aware of what we are about to do

https://www.base-search.net/Search/Results?type=all&lookfor=Action+Fluency+and+conscious+intention&ling=1&oaboost=1&name=&thes=&refid=dcresen&newsearch=1%C3%B9

Undermining Free Will Belief Increases Forgiveness of Self and Others

👉 ((btw www.base-search.net is a great search engine for scientific papers))

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're arguing against a stance that no one is making. Nobody is suggesting that no free will implies freedom from consequences

Except for the people in this very thread arguing that exactly, or arguing that evil people can be talked into being good people. Maybe have a chat with them instead.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago

I don't see anyone here making such claim. Thus my response to you in the first place.

Also, I take that you do believe in free will? Then why do you suggest evil people lack the capacity to change? Those two seem to be in conflict.