Notice that these ridiculous 'news' are NOT immediately pulled apart by 'The Guardian' - even when it is completely obvious.
The Guardian are NOT an unbiased 'lefty' news-paper, but just a standard western/UK for-profit oligarch owned propaganda outlet. They regurgitate what they are paid to say.
If their articles have absolutely NO relation to current geo-politics, or western power structure, we might get an almost unbiased article, but there are no 'journalism' or journalistic standards from that outlet - at all.
literally false. the guardian is the only independent outlet out there that does not give profit to shareholders. they are known for their bylaws independent finances.
how do you want them to have it “pulled apart”? the #1 rule of writing says that if something is ridiculous, you don’t need to say so, not to mention new writing is not meant to editorialize.
Notice that these ridiculous 'news' are NOT immediately pulled apart by 'The Guardian' - even when it is completely obvious.
The Guardian are NOT an unbiased 'lefty' news-paper, but just a standard western/UK for-profit oligarch owned propaganda outlet. They regurgitate what they are paid to say.
If their articles have absolutely NO relation to current geo-politics, or western power structure, we might get an almost unbiased article, but there are no 'journalism' or journalistic standards from that outlet - at all.
literally false. the guardian is the only independent outlet out there that does not give profit to shareholders. they are known for their bylaws independent finances.
how do you want them to have it “pulled apart”? the #1 rule of writing says that if something is ridiculous, you don’t need to say so, not to mention new writing is not meant to editorialize.