this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
40 points (100.0% liked)
Programming
28458 readers
271 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think C# handles this pretty well. You include namespaces with whatever granularity you need, down to a single class (or interface or whatever) and can alias them.
I bet Java had this too, C# us still mostly Java: Microsoft Edition.
You also don't have to use imports at all in C# code - you can just reference everything absolutely using the full namespace and class name.
That's a big difference compared to the other languages. C# automatically loads the correct assembly (.NET library) on the first call to something contained within it, whereas languages like Python require an
importstatement because that's what loads the library. I don't think autoloading is very common - C#, PHP, Ruby and Perl use it, but I can't think of other languages that do.Rust & Java also do this
c# is delphi with some realized mfc lofty goals.
first, microsoft liked delphi and hired the guy who created delphi to create c#
second if you read an mfc book from the 90s that talks about history and goals, 6ou can see they wanted the .net framework
Java doesnt have aliases. You can do glob imports of a particular package (IE all the classes) and you can statically glob import all the static functions in a class but uh yeah that's it
Wow, now I have something to hold over all my Java dev friends. Thanks!
you can also tell them java cant handle.pointers. i have worked with a lot of backend c code using c#.
not sure about the following but:
can you control how a struct is handled in memory in java? (had tto do this with a c# front end calling a credit card verifyling service/library written in c++)
do they have value types?
Java doesnt have value types or structs. You have primatives (booleans, integer types and float/double) and then everything else (even the uppercase primative types like
Boolean) are reference types, IE on the heap. For stuff that plays with pointers you generally just call into native code, get back a long (the pointer to whatever you just allocated) and you call into native code to do stuff with the pointer. Native code can make a proper java object but it's involved and has all the same cons as allocating one in Java land.Supposedly
records (a pseudo struct) might get stronger optimization options (IE put on the stack) but fundementaly reference types are just pointers and if you get an object via constructor or parameter the language must support you putting it in global stateYou cqn't really control the layout as that would prevent the JVM from reshaping your classes (which is a fundamental requirement for things like Dalvik (android jvm))
Conversely, I’ve written C++ code to into DLLs interop with .NET. It makes a lot of sense given what .NET was developed for.
It's actually pretty similar to rust, only that rust can import multiple modules (namespaces) in one line, which is just syntax sugar, and the syntax is slightly different.
Your example would be
Rust adds the curly brace syntax so you can import a specific subset from a module, but I can’t decide if I like that. In C# you just keep adding extra lines which take up more vertical space, but if you sort your using a alphabetically (which your IDE can do), I think you get a very readable list. In sum, Rust adds a feature that I don’t really actually like.
Yeah C# is my favorite, followed by how python does it. Both are very good.
I have so little Python experience I didn’t even mention it, but I remember enjoying that too.
Its s nothing burger so its very good.
What I don't like is doing it 100 times to pull in a main.py but there's ways of getting around it. Its not the languages fault but its kinda what everyone does.