this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
877 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

87956 readers
3523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't much of China's AI progress coming from distilling US models and making them cheaper? Would they be able to develop its capabilities beyond what we have?

[–] cinoreus@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That would be a dangerous assumption. Ofc you can get away saying they're distilling US models to ease the panic, but it's an assumption, and would be catastrophic if turned wrong

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

True, and even if it is correct there's no reason they couldn't start training them without using that shortcut.

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2 points 10 hours ago

Deepseek publicly claims to have created their models, by distilling competitors and that's why they're able to create them really really cheap.

There could be other motives behind such a claim, such as making competitors fear making their most powerful tools public.

Of course they have frontier labs around as well, at the very least at various universities.