this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
104 points (99.1% liked)
technology
24470 readers
87 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think the issue is specifically because the Chinese ai is open source.
The western private ai can not compete with open source ai, there is no business model where they can win.
The only option they have is to get it regulated out of the market and the only way to do that is to kick up fear that ai is dangerous and needs to be given strict safety measures to prevent it from breaking containment and going wild.
There's no way to contain open source, so open source ai will have to be restricted.
This was like a lightbulb "Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh" moment for me when I realised it was about private closed source vs open source. You can restrict "safety" for the private one but you can't make what random people do with open source safe so you just have to shut it down. That's where they're planning to go with this.
The entire trade standoff with China also backfires because the endgame is worse treats.
In 2040, you'll look in Havana, Hanoi, or Hamburg, and they'll have nifty electric cars, solar panels, and have figured out the three trifling tasks AI actually improves once the hype bubble deflates.
Meanwhile, Detroit will be selling a SUV that gets three miles to the gallon and Claude will still be passionately sycophanting to a captive market who can just stare longingly at the rest of the world.
Renting. They want every single thing to be subscription. The end point of capitalism is to turn all personal property into private property that they rent back to us.
Yeah this is true. Before I was combining it, thinking that right now Anthropic and OpenAI are seeing enterprise fly directly into the arms of DeepSeek/moonshot etc as soon as they tried to nudge the usage costs slightly towards the actual costs of serving the tokens.
But your point is probably more relevant—open source is mostly spinning up right now, hobbyists, maybe some small businesses playing—probably some major corps using it a bit, but each month that passes, this is gonna escalate and escalate. Why pay insane token and subscription costs and potentially forfeit all your proprietary corporate data to tech cloud when you could instead invest in a modest gpu cluster that you own and control, and then spin up a model that hits 95% of ability of the so called “frontier” for your use cases? You get to keep everything internal, you can train it towards your processes, you can work on stripping out the refusals, etc etc. this will absolutely be the no-brainer choice for actual enterprise. If the open source models start hitting mainstream-obvious parity or exceeding the closed frontier models (something that is not hard to imagine, they’re already crazy more efficient than the closed ones now), then the closed ai providers are completely done.
And so since closed frontier labs are staring at their own self-inflicted financial suicide, combined with external competition that make their entire product essentially obsolete in short time if they hit their marks; they will instead try to get banned via controlled politicians.
I could imaging that other aspects of capital might act as a counter here, because the incentives for them are going to be pretty heavily weighted against the closed labs holding them hostage forever, but also the economy is pretty much only growing on data center capex and some healthcare, so maybe they temper their resistance because of worries that wider economic crash would also sink them as well…