this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
465 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

88051 readers
3189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, is it easier to change the behavior of 3500 people who can do whatever they want, 340 million people most of whom have some choices in their lifestyle, or 1.4 billion people of whom about half are just doing what it takes to survive?

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Easy" is irrelevant. The climate doesn't care about which is easier.

The simple fact is that China accounts for 1/3 of total global emissions. If the US went completely carbon neutral today, global emissions would be cut from 38.6 Billion tons to.... 33.7 Billion tons.

If China went completely carbon neutral we'd drop from 38.6 Billion tons to 26.3 Billion.

Everyone needs to cut their emissions. China is actively doing the most damage to the climate, however.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 4 points 1 day ago

If Elon musk contributed 90% as much as all of Germany would you be equally happy saying Germany's 80 million people held more responsibility than Musk for their emissions? Per capita is the only measure that makes sense as it is how much each person is contributing.

Another way of looking at it, Yunnan creates far less CO2 than the USA so by your logic the USA is worse than it. Repeat for every other Chinese province.