this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
881 points (95.6% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3765 readers
592 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, anti-communism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

Audiobooks Read by Dessalines

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What is the right direction? Is socialism necessary in your view?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Socialism is not necessary. I'm proposing reduced corporatism to remove the power of companies and their wealth generation capabilities to influence policy.

Politicians should respond to 1 person 1 vote. Not $1 per vote.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What you're asking for is a capitalist state to work against the interests of the class that controls the state, though. That's a practically impossible task, unless the ruling class fears revolt and allows minor concessions.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That's a practically impossible task

That's defeatist. I agree it is difficult but not impossible. Occupy Wall Street is the closest in recent history. That's the last time the ruling class feared a revolt.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It's not defeatist to state that one method is practically impossible, while pretty clearly pointing that revolutionary socialism is both necessary and far more practical. Occupy was an example of a crisis that had real worker momentum, but no organization to take it from unrest to real political change.

Further, I would say the George Floyd protests were spookier for capitalists.