this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
348 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

50976 readers
800 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is unacceptable. And I’m sick of all the fucking workarounds to maintain basic privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

i'm going to switch to devuan since systemd already pre-complied wo anyone commanding them to.

[–] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ll have to give Devuan a look! I’m planning on a server style project next time, so I shouldn’t be crushed too hard by any peculiarities of the init system(s) I try

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago

i chose it because there's not much to look at -- it's just ordinary/vanilla debian without systemd.

[–] who@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Devuan, AntiX, and MX Linux all seem worth a look for people wanting to avoid systemd. More are listed here:

https://itsfoss.com/systemd-free-distros/

https://systemdfree.com/#distros

(FWIW, I think systemd's age data collection is optional, at least for now. It's not clear which Linux distros will implement/adopt it by default.)

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no mention of guix on a systemd less distro list is crazy. not that i use guix, and im fine with systemd as a nixos user, but it feels like guix is the anti nixos. the richard stallman version of nixos with all the pros and cons that come with that

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

I run mine with the nonguix repository so I don't think Stallman would approve of how I lead my life (with all the pros and cons that come with that).

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is such a weird stance given the actual change that was made. No actual age verification, no external communication of any kind. All that got added is a number field. The ability to store a number labeled "age" for user accounts. That's it.

There already is a field for first name and last name. You can leave them blank as well (most probably do). If any software requires a number to be there, just enter 99 or whatever. Unless this gets severely worse this is such a nothing-burger.

I'm not happy about any step into that direction either, but pick your battles (or hill I guess). This certainly is a weird one.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"As a frog, you should wait until the water is already boiling before you hop"

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

i came here to say this but with WAAAY MORE words -- well done!

i think the fact that this community is so averse to admitting that this is a trend and the second such example of the foss community pre-complying w the epstein class' expectations speaks to an political ideology to refuses to accept that fascism is here.