this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2026
676 points (98.3% liked)

Asklemmy

55616 readers
165 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] alekwithak@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I can't believe nobody said Star Trek. In the 70s you had reruns of the original series and the animated series short run. TMP didn't come around until the end of the decade. I wasn't there, but I imagine a 70s trekky would be damn grateful to have all the Trek we have today and they'd probably even love Academy (All the older not chronically online fans I know rave about it).

Edit: regardless of your personal opinion on nu trek, the answer fits the question. A trek fan from the 70s would be blown away by having 13 series and 14 movies available to watch on demand, plus books, games, etc.

[โ€“] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Oofta, Star Trek: Starfleet Academy has a 4.6 on IMDb.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8622160/

[โ€“] alekwithak@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

What would TNG's first season have if it was standalone and came out today

[โ€“] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

I dunno man, but probably better than that ๐Ÿ˜‚

[โ€“] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Like a 6-7 probably

[โ€“] AgentSeven@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Well, now you can't say all the older not chronically online fans you know rave about it, because I'm older, not chronically online and I think it sucks.

Edit: I've just found out that "not chronically online" means "too incompetent to do shit online" so my apologies for misunderstanding. I thought it just meant, you know, not being online a lot. Like me. I've posted to Lemmy about 10 times in the past 5 days. I have literally no other social media accounts on the Internet. I was on Facebook for like a week in 2014 before I noped out. BUT! I can make an account on Lemmy, so my opinions about Star Trek are clearly only informed by being a chronically online mouth-breather.

[โ€“] alekwithak@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The people I'm talking about would struggle with Reddit, let alone Lemmy. To paraphrase Lt. Commander Nella Daren; 'You're more online than you think you are."

[โ€“] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

my dad thinks it sucks

[โ€“] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 days ago

"not chronically online". Has a Lemmy account.