this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2026
676 points (98.3% liked)

Asklemmy

55616 readers
171 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] debil@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Well, still no flying cars.

[โ€“] TrumpetX@programming.dev 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I will maintain that we have flying cars, and we have had them for some time. They're called helicopters.

[โ€“] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Also, Autogyros.

[โ€“] ATPA9@feddit.org 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We can barely handle non flying cars. Can you imagine the amount of mini 9/11s drunk ~~drivers~~ flyers will cause?

[โ€“] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The chance of collision in 3d space is so much lower than 2d.

[โ€“] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's a lot harder to paint lanes in the sky

That's what the chemtrails are for.

[โ€“] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Superconducting levitation is probably the closest we can get safely. Or maybe once we got reliable assist systems.