this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
356 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

88183 readers
2582 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they're so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition out of the market before charging basically whatever they want.

I've seen Starbucks do the same thing to independent coffee shops.

Edit: This is a post about real car companies like Nissan, Volvo, Mercedes, Renault, whatever. I don't care about America. Nobody has for decades.

[–] mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago

American car companies (and American built cars) get subsidies from the US, Canada, and Mexico as all three form a single manufacturing chain. They simply have had a different set of priorities that allowed newcomers to eat their lunch, like it happens to any complacent industry.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they're so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition

Used to be, to get them going, robotics, innovation and vertical integration is most of the reason now. An example, BYD have their own roro ships and have ordered another 10,

https://www.whichcar.com.au/news/byd-orders-10-more-car-carriers-export-push-accelerates

and the new ships will be built in China

they make their own batteries, electric motors etc and have massive robotic assembly plants.

To suggest the reason why is because it's not a level playing field is ludicrous, the US spends many billions subsidizing car manufacturers on top of the billions us consumers spend in subsidizing them. directly.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state

Detroit has received $88B in subsidies and loans since 2008. That's why we have so many cheap EV options?

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Heavily subsidized by misery, as well.

Detroit pays union wages and has to respect worker rights (at the top end of the supply chain). The “communist “ state seems to escape these limited obligations in big parts of their supply chains.

[–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Workers in Detroit might get paid union wages, but many auto factories have relocated to the South where they can underpay and abuse workers much more easily. I just did some quick googling and it seems like being a factory worker in China isn't bad compared to in the US. They work in highly automated, clean, air-conditioned spaces like would be found here. Dirty conditions and manual labor are no longer compatible with today's automotive quality requirements. Low level workers make modest wages, but they employ a bunch of engineers and technicians just like here in the US, and they have subsidized cafeterias and some provide housing or stipends for housing. You might criticize the expectation of working significant overtime, but I've worked in factories which had mandatory overtime in the US, so that sort of structural coercion isn't unique to China. Compared to a "right to work" state, Chinese workers have stronger protections from being laid off or fired. The main downside seems to be lax enforcement of safety standards. If the government doesn't notice something unsafe on its own, there isn't a Chinese version of dropping a hint to OSHA.

Now further upstream in the supply chain? No thanks. That's where you'll find abysmal working conditions. Just remember there are good reasons our government wants us to believe everything sucks for workers in China.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yes, and even plum union jobs for floor workers in Windsor or Brampton can be kind of shit too, especially in some of the parts factories.

I expect that from hypercapitalist oligarch-run societies. I don't expect it from vanguard countries. It's a betrayal.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 12 hours ago

Good news, the Vanguard are just capitalists by another name.

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Frankly, american cars could use a knockdown. Tesla was our only real hope, and we would have glided into a strong Tesla and EV empire if conservative dems didn't bail out GM, Chrysler, and Ford. Additionally, Tesla wouldn't have been in a position to get bought by a dumb nazi.

I'd say, let their stuff in. Lets get some good cheap and subsidizes vehicles from China on the condition that they don't raise car prices by more than 2% a year.

American companies will more than likely fall on their face and hopefully die. Making room for a new american car company to take their place.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And yet even at 2-3x the price, the Chinese EVs provide a better value than the handful of the American options they would compete against.

This SUV would be competing with the likes of a high end EV option like Lucid or Tesla. The Lucid Gravity starts a around $70k, and the Tesla Model X (now discontinued) was around $92k.

The Xiaomi SU7 (the car the Ford CEO has driven since 2024, despite being banned in the US) starts at $32k and clearly is targeted to compete the Porsche Taycan at $112k.

The vehicle in this article has heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats, and over 1,000 miles of range. Functions western companies consider "luxury" are basically just standard in the Chinese market like heated and ventilated seats. They don't even bother to advertise things like that because it's a minimum expectation. There are zero western options that come close to something like that. The options available in the US suck, even taking industry subsidies into account.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats,

Never have I once thought I needed any of that bullshit.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

it seems to want it to be like a compact RV rather than a SUV

because all of those does sound like something you want in an RV

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And yet there it is, along with basically every other "luxury" feature western companies save for high end models... all for the price of a base model SUV here.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Those aren't luxury car features (minus the fridge), those are camper van features lol

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 11 hours ago

The point is that what western car companies consider "luxury" features they charge extra for, like heated seats and that sort of thing, are basically standard there. So the luxury features they include to separate these models from the pack are these more niche things.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

High-end EV options

Ok

like Tesla

...fucking WHAT?

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I see you forget about the first 3 models that Tesla made that were $70k or higher when they were discontinued, and all launched at $90k+

[–] boonhet@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

They were only high-end EVs because the EV market was dogshit then. They've never competed with high-end cars in general.

Unfortunately it's a race to the bottom and high-end cars are doing the same Tesla bullshit of a minimalist interior with a huge display instead of physical buttons with heft like they used to.

[–] notalannister@fedinsfw.app 69 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh yeah, because US car companies are NOT subsidized at all /s

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Both statements can be true at the same time. But the scale of one is many times larger.

China’s MO from rare earths and magnets to cars to silicon follows the same plan. Take IP, Subsidize the industry, Research, once you have a monopoly use it to squeeze adversaries.

I will say at least China is willing to kill off underperforming companies.

The US needs to let a lot of legacy companies that aren’t performing die off. It also needs to break up oligopolies in many industries. Why compete when you can buy up the future competitors and set prices with a handful of competitors. The financialization of our economy is choking us.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but try launching a new auto startup here. It's a lot harder than in China.