this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
163 points (96.0% liked)

Selfhosted

62256 readers
621 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey guys, since I got into hosting my own servers, any electronic device I see I wonder - can it become a server?

This is probably not a crazy and new idea with android phones, but I had to share it with you. If you don’t know, there’s this thing called postmarket OS, full linux experience on an android phone.

Of course, not all phones are supported, but a phone like Galaxy Note 9 is a great candidate - it supports LAN over usb, postmarket OS fully supports it (the Exinos version) and setting up a phone as a selfhosted server has it’s real perks. Pis got really expensive, not to mention they don’t have a built-in UPS (phones have batteries), they use slow SD cards, while phones have faster UFS memory, phones draw way less power.

What do you guys think? I will for sure get a used Galaxy Note 9 and explore this idea, and if all goes well, I might even buy more of them and create a cluster.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uKale@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wouldn't do it because of the fire hazard. Better to use hardware that is meant to run 24/7 plugged in.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Yep. I was going to use an old one as a security camera but thought better of putting a lithium battery permanently plugged in on a windowsill.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Newer phones have mandated removable batteries, wonder if they run without them being installed

[–] 4k93n2@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"bypass charging" is becoming a bit more popular now. you see it on some android gaming tablets where it bypasses the battery once a cable is plugged in, which makes sense considering how quickly the battery would run down on those. i think i saw the recent google pixel devices having this feature as well so many it will just be a thing on all phones eventually

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

Yeah been using it on my phone, keeping it plugged in wherever possible has definitely extended the battery life

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 25 points 1 day ago
[–] horus_son_of_isis@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I think there is a way to fool it by soldering a jumper on the battery contacts. Probably varies from phone-to-phone.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Most mobile devices have their power management modules configured to prevent booting unless they receive an all good signal from a connected battery. It is possible to take that signal, but not trivial.