this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
885 points (99.2% liked)

Funny

16257 readers
2100 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 19 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm one of the seeming few who paid to register it back in the Win9x days. Turned out that the key also works for the non-free Linux version (think I only ever bothered to set that up once). These days gzipped tarballs or squashfs with zstd are my go-tos. The former for speed with source trees or such, and the latter for filesystem backups or larger directories, because loop mounting it is so fast and convenient.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

These days gzipped tarballs or squashfs with zstd are my go-tos.

What the fuck did you just call me?

[–] TARgz@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

your mom gave me zstd in my tarballs

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago

And Jia Tan xz'd in your back door?

[–] katze@lemmy.4d2.org 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The former for speed with source trees or such

xz -0 is faster than gzip and has a higher compression ratio.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

That can't be right, all reports I have read about comparing xz with gzip tells me that xz will have better compression but at a slower speed than gzip.

Have you run a test of gzip at the same compression level with the same data?

I don't doubt that xz will be smaller, I doubt it will be quicker.