this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
509 points (94.1% liked)

Open Source

49234 readers
188 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I had a report for AI slop today. 1m LOC in 3 months. How do you even modify and distribute that? I do not think we had a rule against it.

IMHO if we allow, the community gets drowned out by AI vomit and it is harder to see handcrafted loved projects that are easy to modify and distribute.

My mind is to ban it to preserve open source.

Are folk in agreememt with this line? Would love to hear your thoughts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe start out with strict labeling guidelines. If it's AI then it should be labeled as such. If a user posts something that's Ai and doesn't label it then ban that user. Maybe a warning first up to you.

But if the choice is between blanket everything allowed or blanket ban I lean more toward blanket ban.

[–] feral_sh@lemmy.today -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think disclosure is the most important piece. I don’t create anything without AI nowadays, but I’m:

  • planning architecture
  • addressing common exploits
  • running penetration tests
  • having automated code review pipes from different models
  • directly specifying details of how the code should work

I’m not so sure everyone is doing that. And if anyone has advice on how to improve, let me know!