this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
1293 points (98.8% liked)
Linux Phones
3928 readers
479 users here now
The Discussion on Linux-based Phones.
Benefits:
- Hardware freedom.
- Perfect operating-system competition.
- Full utilization of specs.
- Phone lifespan raises to 10+ years.
- Less e-waste.
Linux Mobile Distros:
- Sailfish🇫🇮
- Ubuntu Touch🇩🇪
- Postmarket OS🇨🇭
- Mobian
- Pure OS🇺🇸
- FuriOS🇺🇸
- Plasma Mobile🇩🇪
- LuneOS
- openSUSE Mobile🇩🇪
- Nemomobile
- Droidian
- Mobile NixOS
- ExpidusOS
- Maemo Leste
- Manjaro Arm
- Tizen
- WebOS
Linux Mobile Hardware:
- Fairphone 6🇳🇱
- Jolla Phone🇫🇮
- Volla Phone🇩🇪
- Shift Phone🇩🇪
- FLX1🇺🇸
- Librem 5🇺🇸
⚙️Contribute
🧼Go Clean From the Duopoly:
💻Related Communities:
📰News:
💬Messager:
⌚️Watch:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is such an oversimplification and shows you don't understand how much work goes into this.
Again, any source for this argument with the hexagon processor? My patches has been plenty criticized by kernel developers, but so are fully manually written patches, which is the entire point of the kernel review process. Unless you seriously are saying that everyone on the list who has sent a v2 is a bad quality programmer.
When we were talking in DMs i again asked you for your source, reason, or any info for this so i can look at it and fix it if needed, but again you just result to throwing insults like you did in DM.
They are being added, by me, by nondescriptpointer, by Luca, by the people at Qualcomm. I have good contact with them for this. I don't understand your grudge against me.
I know how much work goes into it, I'm doing mainlining work myself. It's really a lot of work.
Also, I have NOT had any conversation with you via DM.
I doubt I would start a DM conversation with you now that you are publishing lies about this. 🙄
So far I had nothing against you as a person, but you are starting to change that rapidly.
Well i wrongly believed i was continuing a conversation then, if that isn't the case my apolgies.
If you understand how much work it is then how can you say "just generates code"?
For openness this is the conversation i am referring to:
As they are the same instance and the same conversation i believe lenni and erebion are the same person.
This paragraph is anchored in the part where once again instead of any source or info on their argument and all they respond with is
You know, an instance can have multiple users.
Sometimes people have the same opinion, I am also a sceptic when it comes to generated code, like many others.
I will notify my user that you are publishing a conversation with him. That conversation was not meant to be published, otherwise it would have beeb posted publicly.
There is no personal identifying information there. Just a disagreement.
Its not just the same opinion, its the combination that makes it read like a continuation of the same conversation with the same person: the exact same point, no source, and same instance. That made me suspicious enough to conclude im talking to the same person.
I have published the conversation for transparency reasons, no personal info was shared.
Not to mention DMs on lemmy aren't even private anyways.
Posting a conversation you had with someone — that did not expect it to be published — is NOT okay.
If there was no reason to post it i would agree, but here its important context.
If a person attacks me publicly while referring to points made in a DM where no private info was shared that is important context then i think its better to be transparent about this then hide this.
You said i was posting lies earlier, this is direct proof against your claim as this conversation did happen. Which there would not have been if i hadn't posted it.
Some people are just here to ruin the fun.