Asklemmy

55652 readers

359 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

What spelling, grammar or semantics rules have been lost in your lifetime? (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Dagobah@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

133 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Language is always changing. At one point 'an apron' was 'a napron' while words like 'literally' are no longer literally literal. What are some language battles that have been lost in living memory and what are some others you predict will soon occur?

Edit: Non-english examples very welcome!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] _deleted_@aussie.zone 40 points 4 days ago (2 children)

“Decimating” no longer means killing ten percent as the Romans did; now it is used to mean the killing of a majority, so it’s close to the opposite of its original meaning.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I thought decimating meant reducing to a tenth, as in removing 90%?

[–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 4 days ago

No. It meant killing every tenth soldier in a line

[–] Klear@piefed.world 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The meaning is derived from the brutality of the act, not the proportion of people killed.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You're being downvoted, but I suspect you're actually correct. A note about the act of decimation: it wasn't just killing every tenth soldier. It was that the other nine soldiers were forced to kill the tenth. It was an absolutely brutal act where soldiers were forced to kill their friends and comrades.

It makes sense that saying an act is as brutal as decimation would then come to replace the word itself over time. That happens pretty frequently in language evolution.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 3 points 4 days ago

People really love to feel smug about others using words "wrong" for some reason. Let them. I don't care.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The "deci" prefix is just a coincidence then?

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

More like a vague gesture, which, in idiom chock-full of metonymy, is legitimate.