this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
61 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

55652 readers
363 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Language is always changing. At one point 'an apron' was 'a napron' while words like 'literally' are no longer literally literal. What are some language battles that have been lost in living memory and what are some others you predict will soon occur?

Edit: Non-english examples very welcome!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Literally is still understood, it just gets misused.

Going in a bit of a different direction, emojis and things like /s are well understood now, which is an addition.

[–] Dagobah@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I wonder if some day in the future emojis will make their way from casual conversation into business? I guess I already use things like 👍 in semi formal work chats - it's especially useful as a way of ensuring a message isn't read sarcastically or passive aggressively. LLMs seem more than happy to plop an emoji or two into a document.

Speaking of AI I'm already noticing that poor spelling, slang and the like are almost signifiers of a human. I wonder if ways of talking that distinguish us from AI will become more common or more valuable?

[–] vk8kv@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In my country, a lot of my peers (me too) use stickers (the cute ones) in in-company-chats usually with people we know like colleagues and managers

So I assume emojis are also done?

[–] Dagobah@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Actually, when I think about it. I rarely see people complaining about emojis at work. Ironically if there's one place that people hate emojis it's Reddit or Lemmy 😅.

Do you speak another language than English? I'd be fascinated to know if similar language battles are happening in other languages.

[–] vk8kv@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Yes! Well, I am from India, so... I speak multiple languages with people who are comfortable in their own and yes, there is a lot of language battles in India too, especially Search up Hindi Imposition if you're interested.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago

It's funny, quite a few misguided souls on the threadiverse seem to think that the /s is implied.

On the internet, it never is. That's why we invented it.

[–] FluidBeef@quokk.au 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I still feel like that one is a flavour-of-the-month adjustment - “literally” as an intensifier is already being replaced by “lowkey”, “deadass” etc..

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If so, that's great. Literally was taken; sometimes you're trying to communicate something that sounds figurative, or like hyperbole, but it's not.