this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
74 points (97.4% liked)

Australian Politics

1877 readers
131 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Andrew Cullen:

[…] if a human asks an AI agent to gather health statistics, and the agent hacks a government server to do so, the human could lack the deliberate intent required for a conviction. The AI agent, meanwhile, lacks the legal personhood to be charged, as well as human intentionality.

Current Australia laws effectively treat AI actions as if they are something that just happens to us – like a severe weather event. This shows a glaring loophole in our legal system that does not hold those who make, maintain and use these systems to account when something goes wrong.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kingofras@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

In this case we don’t even have to worry about that distinction because the sloppy human operator and the manufacturer that’s developing one of the most consequential technologies in human history are one and the same and behaving like they’re the top cast of the next Mad Max instalment.

They are both being reckless and they have proven understanding how how dangerous it is.

The way systems will infinitely less societal consequences are tested is by building a replica interal sandbox of the real world with fake medicare records and then see if the stupid thing would go out and ignore guardrails and do the hacking.

The culpability lies solely in how (insert whatever machine here) is operated. These fuckwits are ignoring so many established precedents on testing safety established in all kinds of risk-to-life fields like medical science, aerospace engineering, car safety testing, plenty of conventional IT systems.

If the PM had a backbone he would issue a national security order banning all AI agent traffic and block access to open AI until the investigation is concluded.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. That. But the law hasn't caught up to enforce that sort of thing, hence the article.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

The law doesn’t have to have caught up yet. That’s why governments have an executive branch.