Australian Politics

1877 readers

131 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone

An OpenAI agent hacked Medicare. Will anyone be held responsible? (theconversation.com)

submitted 10 hours ago by bignose@aussie.zone to c/australianpolitics@aussie.zone

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Andrew Cullen:

[…] if a human asks an AI agent to gather health statistics, and the agent hacks a government server to do so, the human could lack the deliberate intent required for a conviction. The AI agent, meanwhile, lacks the legal personhood to be charged, as well as human intentionality.

Current Australia laws effectively treat AI actions as if they are something that just happens to us – like a severe weather event. This shows a glaring loophole in our legal system that does not hold those who make, maintain and use these systems to account when something goes wrong.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 1 points 2 hours ago

No no no. This is the wrong approach.

If corporations are people (in the US: supreme court decision on Citizens United) then the outputs of these AIs are speech. We may not like it, but it's where we are.

It's kind of wild to me that we watched the whole AI development cycle, but when it started getting squirrelly in terms of output, now we have to hedge. And, somehow, doom and gloom is the paid diversion.

Maybe this is a massive failure, and people calling for caution because of the doom and gloom are marketing. It is designed to make people stop hating on the corporations who mindlessly pushed this anti-human trash.