this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2026
347 points (97.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49980 readers
431 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it really necessary to send humans to those places just to get the knock-on benefits? Couldn't we do those things directly, without going there?

It seems to me that, today, those who have the money to spend on these endeavors would only do so if there were perceived short-term benefits to themselves. That means they plan to exploit the resources, or increase their own power somehow.

I know the good engineers that make this happen are doing it for the challenge and in the pursuit of knowledge, and I know that's why we poors support it, but that doesn't "pay the bills." What is the motivation behind the money? Why are they really doing this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Interstellar is just a movie, mate. There is no such planet, time passes at the same rate everywhere - ie the caesium standard.

Time dilation is a thing, but as far as I'm aware it's not possible to travel someplace, pass any greater amount of time, and then return as though less time had passed - that's time travel. It's theoretically impossible, at least with current technology and understanding of relativity. Great movie though.

Edit: downvote if you don't understand that time dilation isn't magic, and you can't travel back through time.

[–] illi@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

As far as we know, traveling through time backwards is impossible.

Traveling through time forwards is very much possible though - in fact we are doing exactly that right now!

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I explicitly said 'return back as though less time had passed' - i.e. backwards time travel - was theoretically impossible.

I never claimed travel forward though time was not.

[–] illi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not about returning back in time - it's just one place would travel forward slower than another place.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're telling me what I was talking about? Returning back in time is exactly the comment I was responding to.

This is incredibly random but I’ve been wondering lately what might happen if we colonized a place where comparatively speaking time moves much faster than on Earth.

In theory you could bring back years of advancement in a shorter timespan, but this is obviously just a pipe dream.

This goal is impossible for the reasons I explained.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You need to work on reading comprehension.

The concept being brought up is that we could compress years or centuries of research into a small time frame and 'bring it back' to our world, not go back in time. Obviously nonsense, but not actually physically impossible.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Yep how do you bring back the advancement chief?

Travel? Cool, by the time it arrives, the exact same amount of time will have passed locally as remote. The 100 years of advancement will arrive after your local advancement + travel time. So it will already be out of date. Useless.

You'd have to use faster than light travel, or communication - eg by quantum entanglement over a distance ten million orders of magnitude greater than we've ever witnessed it. Woah, did someone say that this is fundamentally impossible with our current understanding and technology? Yes, they did. Reading is fun.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I didn’t get the idea from the movie, I’m talking about how time passes differently depending on the pull of gravity; and that’s why I kind of alluded to this being theoretical at best. I don’t actually think it’s feasible to find an enormous planet just to have time pass more quickly.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yep, and as I said, the return trip with all the rapidly evolved super-geniuses would be the impossible part of the plan.

You can't travel someplace else - experience say 100 years, and then travel back to your place of departure and have had only 20 years passed. That's fundamentally impossible.

have had only 20 years passed

Have had only 20 years pass in the local frame of reference, not the frame of the evolved super geniuses. Thus everybody on earth gets to enjoy the benefits, if there are any.

[–] hornywarthogfart@sh.itjust.works -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The problem is that your return to Earth would slowly move you back down the dilation losing the gains.

You can take two routes to a restaurant. One is very short but curvy and has a slow speed limit. The other is a really long straight shot with high speed. You can think of your scenario as such a case where even though the straight path is longer, it takes the same "time" to get to the restaurant.

You would be taking the faster, longer route while Earth takes the windy slow route but as you arrived back you would still be in sync.

Edit to add: Spacetime is a single thing which is why the above behavior the case.

That's not how time dilation works. Astronauts that have spent significant time on the ISS have experienced — however marginally — less time than their identical twins on Earth.