this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
140 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

88272 readers
2631 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A20 Pro vs Intel Ultra 7 Series 3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kaidenshi@lemmy.world 43 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

And yet, it can't (be made to) run a full desktop OS

I'm not disagreeing with the rest of your post, but you do realize the MacBook Neo running the desktop macOS is using the A18 Pro, right? The A20 is an iteration on the same design and will likely end up in the next MacBook Neo.

[–] amgine@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I think OPs point is not that it’s unable to, is that Apple won’t let it

[–] kaidenshi@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It appears OP wasn't clear they were talking about a phone using the A20 SoC, their message was a direct reply to the article posted which was about the A20 Pro itself and not any particular phone using it. Hence my reply which was also about the A20 SoC and not any particular phone.

I stand behind what I said: The A20 Pro will likely end up in a future MacBook, where it will definitely be running the desktop macOS.

Now, the fact that desktop macOS is becoming more and more like iPadOS/iOS is a discussion for another thread ;-)

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I don't really see how you can read that post and not see they were talking about phones, but you are right that the A20 Pro will almost certainly show up in a MacBook Neo successor at some point.

Edit: And what do you think the benchmark was run on? It was a phone.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

“Won't let it” by putting it in a Macbook and running MacOS on it?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

As in you plug your phone into a monitor and it becomes a fully fledged desktop running MacOS, and you don't have to buy a 2nd device from Apple.

Edit: Like Samsung DEX

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Dex is a really neat concept, but ultimately sucks ass.

Maybe the duo will baby step us towards that. But even iPad OS which supports this for years is rough.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Have you tried the newer one built into AOSP yet? Is that one any better?

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's been a year or two since I tried it last. Are current Samsung phones using dex or the AOSP one? Or does the Pixel 9a running Graphene OS support it?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The Samsungs are still using DEX. I think only Pixels support the AOSP one right now, but it's there for other OEMS / devs to build upon. I don't know if Graphene OS supports it or not.

Edit: I just realized, I do have a pixel 8 for development work, and the cable to run it somewhere. Maybe I can find it and give it a try.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Who said anything anything phones specifically? You pulled some random criterion out of your ass.

And by this logic, Google also doesn't let you run desktop OSes on phone CPUs, because their phones don't do some random thing that you saw somewhere.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Apple intentionally limits what features iOS and 'iPadOS' have versus macOS to sell as many devices as possible. An alternate reality where Apple were consumer-friendly would converge all three operating systems into one, with a limited feature set on smaller screens that expands into the full feature set if connected to an external monitor with a docking adapter.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

And Android is as full-featured as a desktop?

Jobs was pretty much describing iPad as what computers would be like ‘in the future’ in interviews in the eighties. It was his vision for ages. IPhones and iPads allowed more people to use computers than all desktop OSes combined.

And again, what does this have to do with the processor? You people just jump at any opportunity to mention how you hate Apple?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

They could even sell a laptop shell that connects with the phone so you don't pay for the phone internals twice except the shell having a 2nd battery for the bigger display. The shell could then survive for an even longer time than a regular laptop as the internals keep getting upgraded via the phone instead of a whole new laptop.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Plus, if game developers targeted ARM instead of x86, im sure their games would actually run great on those A20s, but they're probably not going to make an ARM version of their game.