this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
147 points (96.2% liked)
Showerthoughts
43884 readers
324 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I do some freelancing that involves online desk research, and for some topics, it's like pulling teeth to find a source written by a real human. Even non-Google search engines can't help but give me dozens of obviously AI-written pages. Which is why I as a human am getting paid to do real research. It's literally wading through slop to find anything a human did.
The thing is, AI companies are terrified of model collapse because if they train AI systems on AI output, the model becomes useless. But the rate at which websites on any topic are just slop being scraped to train a new model seems to be either unsustainable for using the open internet for that training, or an assured way to reach model collapase quickly.
There are different theories around model collapse, so there might be a way to avoid it even if most of your training data is AI generated. The jury is still out though
That's actually not a fact, more of a possibility. As far as am I aware, reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF) is currently employed by some of the most capable frontier AI companies; Anthropic openly admits to it, and their models are arguably the best.
A term that is often thrown around nowadays is recursive self-improvement (RSI), and it seems that there are at this time more knowledgeable proponents of RSI for intelligence development than opponents who raise the risk of model collapse.
But yes, training on today's sloppified public internet would probably only have downsides.
That is just so depressing. It's eating its own garbage to create more content. Like some image that's been run through multiple passes of lossy compression with different algorithms.