this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
147 points (96.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

43884 readers
324 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's hard to put this into words succinctly. But when I was a kid before the Internet, the library was the main source of human knowledge, and it was very organized through the Dewey Decimal System which imposed a kind of tree-like hierarchy across a wide spectrum of topics. And while I imagined that one day this might all wind up served by computers, I thought this organization would survive the transition. But it didn't.

I suppose in the early days of the Internet, they tried? Yahoo was kind of an Internet directory in the beginning, and the Whole Internet catalog was another such effort. But these eventually fell apart and we had to resort to search engines to find anything. Frankly, it's a bit like the early days of personal computing when we used flat file systems instead of hierarchical ones with proper directory trees. When you were limited to what could fit on a floppy, this wasn't such a big burden. But the Internet as it stands might as well be a giant flat file system.

Today, even the search engines are failing us, and we are turning to AI. In the pre-Internet era, we had sort of an equivalent to this also. They were called librarians. But a librarian's job was made easier by the fact that all the books were carefully organized by topic. For AI, it's as though the library were just a massive pile of books tossed around haphazardly and the librarian had to make sense of it enough to pull whatever you're looking for out of the chaos. Is it at all surprising, then, that it takes a huge amount of energy and computing resources to make any of this work?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

search engines are failing us

But this isn’t a problem with the internet content or search engine technology. This is because every search engine company just wants to show you ads and paid content rather than actually search for things anymore. Which 20 years ago, it used to do quite well.

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's gotta be partly to do with content though, right? Are there any search engines that effectively sort through the slop?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

I meant to go back and edit or reply to another comment to walk back my statement a bit. There is a problem with content. The walled gardens hide content from search engines. So you can only find their content by being logged in to their service and using their search tools (which are also shit.) So yeah, there’s that too.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago

Many people have noticed a decline going back to 2020 when Google decided they need to show more ads, which means you need to search more times or check more pages than the first one rather than getting the desired result right away.

Kagi seems to be better at this since it's paid and doesn't need to show you ads.

But of course you're right that content itself has sloppified too.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

yep

Search engines were, at one point, pretty fuckin good at finding what you needed, and would put it at the top of the first page of results

but then some companies coughgooglecough realized that users would be okay going to page 2 or 3 for their results, so they intentionally undid a decade+ of search engine improvements, and started forcefully putting relevant shit 2-3-4 pages in, so they could harvest more clicks and shove more ads in your face.

and thus enshitification began.