this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
304 points (67.8% liked)
Late Stage Capitalism
3850 readers
637 users here now
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, anti-communism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.
Introduction to Socialism (external links)
Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course
Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Plural you, dumbass. As in "you types".
You want me to cite a comment where you aren't doing something?
Funny to talk of semantics when you're the one engaging in it. Do you not know how communication works? I am using you as a jumping off point for a generalisation.
So how would I point to a place where youre agreeing with someone you think is a bot, when I point out people like you don't accuse those who agree with you of being bots?
Oh wow, what a tough guy. What are you gonna do, post something really mean?
It really seems like you don't understand what the plural you is. It seems like you think I know you. I don't, and I am very happy with that. You seem to suck.
Anyway, the mentality you have is laughable. You expect me to go through your comment history looking for a comment where I could reasonably argue you're agreeing with a bot, in order to substantiate my statement that I don't ever see you types accusing those you agree with of being bots?
First of all, what kind of weirdo goes through peoples comment history in general?
Secondly, the task doesn't even make sense. I don't ever see you accusing anyone you agree with of being bots, that wouldn't change even if you had done so.
Thirdly, I did just use you as a jumping off point, entirely reasonably too. You made a deranged accusation that someone was a bot because they disagreed with you. So there we go.
edit: Alright I just went through your comment history and didn't find an instance of you accusing someone you agreed with of being a bot. Guess you're gonna have to prove me wrong by citing a comment where you do exactly that.
edit edit: holy shit I just saw you talk to another user like you knew them personally. Talking about them having a bad reputation "around here" LMAO. You think this is some sort of personal interaction?
Lmao you're ridiculous, write some more please
Edit: Hey now I just forgot I didnt point you didnt back up your statement with proof. Quote me a comment or cut the shit
No no, I did the thing you asked for! Now you have to do it. Bring proof or cut the shit! This is extremely serious and I am very tough!
I think you responded to the wrong comment? This makes no sense as a response