this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
334 points (95.1% liked)
Technology
88390 readers
3207 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm not willing to compromise on my road trip plans. The car can either handle the trip or not. And right now there doesn't exist an EV that can
So we're just going through the standard ~~propaganda~~ excuses. Since apparently we're hung up on the probably 1% of driving you do (where you go more than 250 miles in a single day), let's refer to what I already said above you:
Your "compromise" feelings are unjustified. Even if you it's just iMpOsSiBLe to drive your EV on a road trip (it's not) you can do other things. Like I said, if you're one of the 80% of North American households who own 2 cars you could take the EV for 99% of your trips, and on the 1% road trips you could... take the other car. If you are like me and only own one car you still have the option to rent a car.
Renting a car is relatively cheap and has the added bonus of not wearing down your car with added miles. Now I lived in the Midwest, I remember family car trips that were long. Driving over multiple states in one day. Those trips were rare, thinking once every few years rare. Maybe once a year. Numbers just make sense, a rental car for that infrequent of a trip is cheaper.
And that's all assuming that again you just cannot take your EV on a road trip. Which is absolutely false. I did a 800 mile roadtrip just earlier this year.
You call them excuses when you are simply unwilling to accept the reason.
No you don’t need it 99% of the time, but in that 1% when you need it, you really need it. 99% simply isn’t enough because that 1% is really important.
Time on a road trip is way more important than time in regular drives. I don’t mind being 30min late getting back home from work, that happens all the time from traffic, but 30min late on a roadtrip means you’re missing daylight, or an appointment, or that restaurant you really wanted to try is closed. These are not imaginary hypotheticals, all of these situations have regularly happened to me even with gas cars.
You say this like this is trivial burden. It is not. The mental load of constantly needing to plan stops around fueling is a significant difference from gas cars in experience and is a significant barrier to adoption. This is a real problem and must be overcome in the future if we are to reach higher EV adoption.
We are not talking about today, we are talking about increasing EV adoption, to say 90-100%. If 80% of households have a gas car, you're not getting there.
Again, we are not talking about today, we are talking about a future where EV adoption is 90-100%. How many gas stations will remain in that future?