this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
936 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

88725 readers
2919 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] charokol@lemmy.zip 82 points 3 days ago (6 children)

How long has AI been “teetering on the brink“?

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Most of the historical boondoggles took about 5 years to work their way out. We are on year 3. If that's any guide, we got a whole lot more electric boogaloo left to play.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Most boondoggles don't burn trillions of dollars. AI is starting to hit a wall already because there just isn't any more money. It's why there's this desperate push to go public even though their financials are a dumpster fire.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

"We must keep building stone heads!" Easter Island civilization

"We must keep building datacenters!" Epstein Island civilization

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

As a percentage of Capex to GDP it's about a third of the way to where the railway mania was at during its peak. There's room to run. The difference between then and now is that all the spending is concentrated in a handful of companies.

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 5 points 2 days ago

Another key difference, the Railway mania was powered by commoners investing. Not just a few rich bozos and enormous enterprises putting their money into it, as it is with AI

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Depends if you're asking people who are informed or news headlines. The informed people have been saying the AI bubble is set to burst around Q2-Q3 2027. That's when loan obligations come due and the majority of investors are set for payouts.

The news will say it's happening everyday, just like Trump is just about to die everyday, or MAGA is "turning against him" everyday according to the articles.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

republicans usually crash the economy right toward the end of their term, yeah. pretty much every single time. So Q3 2027 is perfect.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ai can crash before then, if people stop investing money or loaning money. It doesn't mean OpenAI run out of money straight away, but it means the projects they are involved in don't happen, so the mountain of debt piles up and the sources of revenue dry up. So, it all happens faster and the smaller neo-clouds go belly up first.

Already an Aussie one just pulled its launch IPO due to lack of interest and were considering dropping their price significantly.

If the IPO prices of other companies drop significantly, it means the early investors make very little profit, for a lot of risk, so they start to look elsewhere too.

AI companies need huge amounts of investment over extended periods, so either scenario is problematic for them.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Open AI is already backing out of their IPO too.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Most I've seen is because they don't want to release their real financials. So it must be bad enough to spook investors even more than the delay.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

2027

My guess would be 2029, because history doesn't repeat itself but it often rhymes and I want to see Musk jumping down from one of his rockets, but it probably won't last that long, yes.

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Right. It's literally everyday it's brought up. Yet here we are, still using it, still funding the losses. Still funding the climate damage.

[–] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 4 points 2 days ago

AHEM

Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.

[–] sdcSpade@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

Rome hasn't collapsed in a day.

[–] abc@suppo.fi 2 points 2 days ago

Leftists promising AI collapse is like Musk promising full FSD.