this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
261 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

88677 readers
2954 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
261
Bitwarden Switches to Commercial License (community.bitwarden.com)
submitted 17 hours ago by Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club to c/technology@lemmy.world
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://thelemmy.club/post/57178743

RyanL Bitwarden Employee

Hello everyone!

Starting in the next release, the Bitwarden apps published to the various stores will be the commercially licensed builds. No action is needed, and the apps will work exactly as they do today.

Bitwarden remains committed to open source security and transparency
The GPLv3 OSS licensed version continues to be updated and published on GitHub
All current features are available in both versions
License details are on GitHub
Bitwarden remains committed to a robust, free forever plan for everyone

If you have any questions, please ask them in this thread. Thanks all!

EDIT:

Bitwarden is not going closed-source
You can still fork Bitwarden
No change to self-hosting, the licensing change affects those who are repackaging and reselling Bitwarden
The free plan is here to stay permanently
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kr4u7@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

For me it is totp, cloud capabilities and passkeys

[–] Foni@piefed.zip 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I might be a bit paranoid (or an idiot) but I think having the password and the totp in the same database (and app) somewhat negates the point of two-factor authentication.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It does negate the big issue of passwords leaking from the websites and that's the most important part of even having totp.

Nobody is going to spend time to separate the 2 and maintain backups of two different things and all that extra effort when 90% of people don't even use password managers.

Don't let perfection be the enemy of improvement.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

It does, but not every account is worth it

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago

I'm using Strongbox on macOS and iOS. Uses a KeePass2 database in the background, does TOTP (so does KeePassXC), syncs via iCloud (but also supports SFTP, WebDAV, OneDrive, Google Drive, and Dropbox) and also keeps my Passkeys. And it supports Apple's AutoFill API, so it works in basically any input field across the systems and feels "native". No browser extensions (at least for Safari) needed.

And if it goes rogue, I can switch to e.g. KeePassium or any other KeePass-compatible app.