this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
173 points (98.9% liked)

Selfhosted

62626 readers
395 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The question is simple. I wanted to get a general consensus on if people actually audit the code that they use from FOSS or open source software or apps.

Do you blindly trust the FOSS community? I am trying to get a rough idea here. Sometimes audit the code? Only on mission critical apps? Not at all?

Let's hear it!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I usually just look for CVEs. The biggest red flag is if there's 0 CVEs. The yellow flag is if the CVEs exist, but they don't have a prominent notice on their site about it.

Best case is they have a lot of CVEs, they have detailed notices on their sites that were published very shortly after the CVE was published, and they have an bug bounty program setup.

[–] petersr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if the software is just so flawlessly written that there are not CVEs?

/s

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I maintained an open-source app for many years. It leveraged a crypto library but allowed for different algos, or none at all for testing.

Some guy wrote a CVE about "when I disable all crypto it doesn't use crypto". So there's that. It's the only CVE we got before or during my time.

But even we got one.

[–] petersr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh damn, haha.