Linux

68441 readers

477 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

138

Linux security vulnerabilities fixed per kernel version (lemmy.ml)

submitted 20 hours ago by MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Something good coming out of AI, it seems.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (36 children)

This is misleading.

Edit: "misleading" was the wrong word. I was just pointing out that showing data from 4.x to 5.x, 5.x to 6.x also would have made this post more meaningful.

Linux kernel full releases always have CVEs shortly after them because new features, drivers, memory handling tuning, and other capabilities arr introduced, and people (or ai) hammer away at them as soon as they appear.

I acknowledge that the bump has more amplitude because ai tools accelerate this, but this graph isn't the shocker you think it is.

[–] Link@rentadrunk.org 19 points 19 hours ago (7 children)

I thought Torvalds said major versions bumps were meaningless so 6.0 or 7.0 is the same as 6.12 to 6.13

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Minor versions go up according to a certain pattern based on how the change mgmt is handled for the kernel, but major releases are marked when the kernel team "feels it's the right time".

From lwn: https://lwn.net/Articles/871989/

To kernel developers, version numbers continued to have no meaning other than as a measure of where things were on the timeline, he said; users were encouraged to run the latest version. But if you tell customers they need to move from 3.20 to 4.0, they will consider it a multi-year effort that requires planning and paperwork; "so they will only do it when they have time, which is never". Going from 3.20 to 4.0 seems like a big jump, and 4.0 to 4.2 seems much smaller, even though the latter brings roughly double the number of changes.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe in the past, but that doesn't seem to be the case at the moment.

Torvalds pointed out that the numbers he applies to new kernel releases are essentially meaningless.

“We haven't done releases based on features (or on "stable vs unstable") for a long, long time now. So that new major number does not mean that we have some big new exciting feature, or that we're somehow leaving old interfaces behind. It's the usual "solid progress" marker, nothing more.”

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Thanks for this, I think I now understand what others are sating about this.

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (32 replies)