this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2026
230 points (80.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

44381 readers
1127 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All their responses are generated, no conscience there, just AI. "Another brick in the wall" hits stronger than ever now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago (10 children)

This is exactly the kind of black and white reasoning that annoys me about online discourse. The camps of "neverslop" and "techbro shill" are extremely vocal, and squeeze out anyone in between with a nuanced opinion (like myself). And I know I'm not the only one because I get upvotes!

Fuck, Linus Torvalds uses ai. Is he an unthinking npc now? If anyone might be an authority on the ethical use of ai, it would be him.

"But Glitch, that's an appeal to authority fallacy!"

Okay, hypothetical strawman, you have a point.

Sure, there's people who exist who operate like how op describes. I'm not disputing that. But saying everyone who uses ai at all is braindead is both incorrect and insulting. I use ai for some shit, it's genuinely a somewhat useful tool and middling quality entertainment. But did ai write this comment? No, it did not, nor has ai told me what my opinions should be. So, proposal disproved by counterexample.

Someone is going to tell me I'm taking this too seriously, i can feel it.

[–] SteveGoob@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

It sounds like, for the purposes of this post, you and many other people would not be in the "People who use AI" category:

All their responses are generated, no conscience there, just AI.

I have coworkers who are effectively meat proxies. I think the term NPC applies well to how interacting with these folks feels, since it does feel like I'm not talking to a real human, but a computer trying to appear human.

Is OPs net too wide? Probably, yeah. But the sentiment is real, the frustration is real, and contextualizing those interactions as with NPCs resonates.

Have your fun with using AI, but there's no need to yum our yuck.

[–] PatteBlanche@jlai.lu 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

How practical :

  • "everyone in this group is stupid"
  • "That's wrong"
  • "no but i only mean the stupid ones"
[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago

Ah yes, the "Everyone is a true Scotsman" fallacy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)