this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
241 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

71083 readers
3475 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
241
Florida ban on kids using social media likely unconstitutional, judge rules (arstechnica.com)
submitted 4 days ago by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A federal judge ruled today that Florida cannot enforce a law that requires social media platforms to block kids from using their platforms. The state law "is likely unconstitutional," US Judge Mark Walker of the Northern District of Florida ruled while granting the tech industry's request for a preliminary injunction...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nephalis@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Weird country. More or less the rest of the world discusses to ban children from social media, but the home of social media wants new addicts to protect the income of the platforms?

[–] neblem@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The main difficulty is defining social media in a way that doesnt restrict other modern communication, education, idea publication, operating a business, shopping, sharing ideas, etc.

Should such laws block Etsy, your family's Nextcloud, a school ran web forum that only students/parents/faculty can access, Crash Course on YouTube, encrypted communication between your family, etc?

The other difficulty is defining the term "children" consistently. Many US states have simple categories that go all the way to 18, if not later.

Should there be a difference in laws for access for toddlers, elementary ages, and adolescents?

If you think these are easy questions, I suggest you look at the dialog around the UK's Online Safety Act where they are having to answer these questions after the fact.

[–] neblem@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Granted this law was more clear cut with 14, 16, and 18 being the dividing lines, but it definitely fails to concisely define social media.

The other issue is how do you verify age, and that has been another difficult question if you think people should have reasonable expectations of privacy and aren't comfortable with the "enter your birthyear" forms.

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

How else are they gonna indoctrinate people to be anti privacy, right wing, anti capitalist…?