this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
298 points (95.4% liked)
Technology
70995 readers
3399 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Do you mean works or falls out of the sky routinely to litter the earth? We build lots as far as smaller ISPs go. You just don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.
Starlink is designed to demise on re-entry. It's a core criteria.
What does that mean to you exactly? All the ones that burnt up early weren’t designed for that lmao
It means it burns up on re-entry and doesn't litter the earth
What about all the ones he didn’t plan on having burnt up? Or didn’t you know about those
I'd love to hear more about this conspiracy theory, can you elaborate?
I think it's hilarious that you think some Starlink satellites AREN'T designed to burn up. They all will, someday.
Not a conspiracy theory. Maybe your science needs some brushing up https://www.independent.co.uk/space/starlink-satellites-elon-musk-space-b2759288.html
they all burn up, that article does not dispute that