this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
590 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

84377 readers
3580 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Good luck transporting a couch on a motorbike.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] credo@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Motorcycle rider here. Yes, families with children will rent a truck anytime they want to purchase groceries, and when it’s raining. It’s not practical.

This is a stupid thread.

[–] fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The maybe use public transport? If you REALLY need to use buy car - buy one.

Also: families were not mentioned before in this thread. Is driving around with your partner and 5 kids and a couch a daily occasion?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol, come here and use our public transport options before you speak. This entire thread is led by those laying wide-reaching proclamations while being unable to consider any situation other than their own.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So the answer would be to advocate for better public transport

[–] credo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, not the answer. I don’t live in New York you clown.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Okay, then advocating for better urban planning and less urban sprawl. Unless you live in a rural area, you shouldn’t be required to go into debt to pay for a multi ton machine to be able to buy food. It’s odd that only in the last hundred years humans have stopped being able to function day to day without vehicles.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You all talk a big game, but I’ve been to about 20 countries so far in my life. Distributed all over the world. They ALL have traffic led by cars. I guess I haven’t been to Mumbai..

Your assumptions are wrong, and you live in fantasy. Get over it.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m not sure what your point is? I never said cars weren’t leading traffic. I think we’ve both kind of lost the plot here but my point was that cars aren’t a requirement to live. If they are in your city or area (outside of rural), then you should advocate for better transit and urban design.

Also note that I never said cars should be outright banned or anything of that sort

[–] credo@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

My point is the point I made up in my first post, which was to argue against the idiotic point that everyone could just use motorbikes, to which you continued to argue with. Here, in case you forgot:

People don't even need car tbh. Motorbikes everywhere please. Zip zip, less traffic, everyone pays attention to road or falls and dies.

[–] newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are you by chance from the US? Because other countries have sensible zoning laws and public transit, making cars for families not a necessity but a luxury. Where I live, nobody needs a car. Shopping is done by cargo bike or hand cart, family trips are taken by train or metro.

If you live in a stupid country tho people might depend on cars.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

It's not perfect but I think this is what people in this thread are fighting for. Which isn't stupid imo

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah no shit for families but for people that have the choice. Fuckin dumbass

[–] credo@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Let me go ahead and quote the broad spectrum claim that came before mine:

People don't even need car tbh. Motorbikes everywhere please. Zip zip, less traffic, everyone pays attention to road or falls and dies.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Like this?

I think personally I would go with this though

(/s cause it is probably needed)

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I retract my statement, this looks perfectly safe and effective.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Putting fewer people in danger than the pavement princess speeding though a yellow light.

[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

And the exact reason that you don't need to buy a truck to transport goods once in a blue moon

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good luck transporting a couch in a car

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 1 points 11 months ago

average suv should have racks on top to strap it and depending on the model space in the back.