this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
21 points (92.0% liked)

Australia

4688 readers
159 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
Nath@aussie.zone
21
Conceived in secrecy and born in haste, Aukus (submarine deal) is on its last legs. (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 6 months ago by thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe to c/australia@aussie.zone
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Aukus had a less than immaculate conception. It was conceived in secrecy and born in haste, a tribute to political opportunism and a travesty of disciplined planning. The enthusiasm of theatrical announcements notwithstanding, it was in trouble from the beginning. The US Navy had serious doubts about both the ability of US shipbuilders to deliver submarines in any workable timeframe and the ability of the Royal Australian Navy to integrate and operate them. That was not a question of trust but of capacity – on both sides.

And, of course, experienced and well-informed Australian defence planners rang the warning bells from the beginning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Is it just sunk cost fallacy at this point or do they know something we don't? There have been red flags for so long now that it will be a major embarrassment if AUKUS genuinely dies and we have no Plan B. "B-b-but the Coalition started it!!!!" won't cut it as an excuse for a second-term Labor government.

[–] Thecornershop@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I've often wondered if there is more to it that is classified or whatever. Albo was not a fan of it, then got a briefing and very quickly signed onto it without any public or even party debate. That stood out to me at the time, and has everytime it comes up since.

load more comments (2 replies)