this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
561 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

71665 readers
3425 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

It might even make smarter decisions. The last few companies I worked for had total morons for CEOs, but they sure maximized short-term profit (by burning the company down).

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I suspect an AI CEO would be more rational and science driven, instead of believing in some ideology that says workers have to feel desperate to be most productive or something. It's possible they'd look at science and then raise the minimum vacation time so people are more productive and generate more profit.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's also possible that they work people until they die, as all the AI from companies communicate and if you get fired from one, you can't get work anymore. People are a resource that keeps regenerating after all.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

People are a resource that keeps regenerating after all.

That's what the AI would call "sustainable business practices"?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)