this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1049 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

71922 readers
3961 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

Ok but what about a headphone jack ?

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 5 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Doesn't seem to have one.

But to be honest, most headphone jacks on these slim phones suck and even a cheap USB-c to audio jack dongle is better than the average phone headphone jack.

The devices from Fiio show that it is still possibile to create a good quality Android device with a good headphone jack, but we might need thicker phones. I just use dongles or audio players

[–] localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

A thicker phone would be great. All these manufacturers forgot at some point we actually need to hold these things with a human hand.

Having said that my fp4 is actually a pretty good thickness. They just screwed that up by rounding the the edge so much seemingly to reduce contact grip.

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 2 points 21 hours ago

To me a thicker phone doesn't help, but if it does for you then okey, that should exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)