this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
324 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

72729 readers
1722 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
324
Robot performs first realistic surgery without human help: System trained on videos of surgeries performs like an expert surgeon (hub.jhu.edu)
submitted 2 days ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A robot trained on videos of surgeries performed a lengthy phase of a gallbladder removal without human help. The robot operated for the first time on a lifelike patient, and during the operation, responded to and learned from voice commands from the team—like a novice surgeon working with a mentor.

The robot performed unflappably across trials and with the expertise of a skilled human surgeon, even during unexpected scenarios typical in real life medical emergencies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Theres no evidence they will ever reach quality output with infinite data, either. In that case, quality matters.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

No we don't know. We are not AI researchers after all. Nonetheless I'm more inclined to defer to experts then you. No offence, (I mean there is some offence, because this is a stupid conversation) but you have no qualifications.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago)

It's less of an unknown and more of a "it has never demonstrated any such capability."

Btw both OpenAI and Deepmind wrote papers proving their then models would never approach human error rate with infinite training. It correctly predicted performance of ChatGPT4.