this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
156 points (98.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33283 readers
1744 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While browsing the fediverse I come across more and more accounts that seem ... a bit off, a little uncanny. The stuff they post seems random, their comments slightly weird. What's going on, is the fediverse being overrun by bots? Or am I as a fanatic anti-AI person just losing my mind and seeing the enemy everywhere?

I hate the fact that I now question every interaction that seems a bit off - it seems such a stupid waste of my time and I'm afraid I might just end up blocking real people who happen to express themselves in a strange way - as a neurodivergent person I know how bad I would feel about being ostracized as 'too strange to be real'. How would you handle this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every account on ~~reddit~~ fediverse is a bot except you.

Jokes aside, I haven't noticed anything. I don't really see what would anyone gain by setting up bots posing as real humans. Especially on Fediverse. I'm not saying it's never happening but I don't think it's very common.

[–] schmorpel@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The 'why' is what I am wondering about. If I were an evil fascist I would fill this place with bots to keep the lefties arguing with the void instead of going outside for direct action. Other than that, curious programmers watching their creations interact in the wild?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Lefties can argue with the void without needing any encouragement!

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Lemmy is seriously not large or organized enough for anyone to consider it. An evil fascist organization has shit to do, like real oppression - not piddling about with a bunch of autists who call for revolution from their moms basements.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago

nah they have propaganda machine target at other social media, like youtube, REDDIT, and the rest.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If I were an evil fascist I would fill this place with bots to keep the lefties arguing with the void instead of going outside for direct action.

Sadly, there aren't enough people here to make that worthwhile.

Other than that, curious programmers watching their creations interact in the wild?

Even with LLMs, getting appropriate responses is a bit of an effort. So is integrating with Lemmy. I'm not saying it's impossible, just that we're really lazy, and it's unlikely that there's a significant volume of bot coders here.

Just Google the number of Lemmy bots. There are disappointingly few.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly, there aren't enough people here to make that worthwhile.

And I likes it thataway!

[–] prex@aussie.zone 2 points 19 hours ago

Its a bit of a trade off. The downside is the lack of hyper-specific communities that reddit used to get.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Out of curiosity is your instance still federated with .ml or that other tankie haven I forget the name of. If so, yes you probably are seeing a lot of bots. It's quite obvious when you look at downvote and upvoter brigades. Pretty unusual for five people to all vote within half a second of each other. Then to not see any other votes for a while.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 13 points 1 day ago

Pretty unusual for five people to all vote within half a second of each other

This is actually a consequence of how votes federate out. They go out in batches, all at once, after a little bit of a delay.

I actually do also think that people are artificially trying to rig the votes about particular things (and frequently the admins catch some people doing it with careless obviousness), but this isn’t an indication, it’s more difficult to detect than that.

[–] LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The "tankie" instances are the least likely to have bots. They're the most vehemently anti-AI and the moderators most active in banning any kind of bot-like activity. Hexbear, the one that all the dronies clutch their pearls about most and accuse of brigading the most doesn't even have downvotes - they are incapable of mass downvoting.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, but they've been trained to treat anyone who disagrees with them as non-human

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today -2 points 15 hours ago

doesnt matter if your instances have annoying propaganda.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This post is a great reminder that when you people say "bot", you just mean "people who disagree with me"

[–] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Wonderful way to put words in someone else's mouth. Shift those goal posts a little further. I'm sure nobody will notice.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Shift those goal posts a little further. I’m sure nobody will notice.

Lol, you don't even know what the phrase "shift the goalpost" means, do you? You just saw it used on Reddit and think it's some kind of magic spell that wins arguments

[–] Forester@pawb.social 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Low effort, replies. Garner low effort replies

I'll let Google answer this one for you

Shifting the goalposts" is an idiom that means changing the rules or conditions of a situation, often in a way that is unfair or designed to make it more difficult for someone to achieve their goal. It implies that someone is deliberately making it harder for another person to succeed by moving the target or changing the requirements after the activity has already begun, according to several online dictionaries. Here's a breakdown of what it means in different contexts: In general: It signifies a change in expectations or standards, often to the disadvantage of someone else. Imagine playing a game where the rules keep changing mid-game, making it harder to win. In an argument: It can refer to someone who keeps changing their stance or demands during a discussion to avoid conceding or to keep arguing. For example, if someone keeps adding new requirements after an agreement has been reached, they are shifting the goalposts. In the workplace: It can mean a manager changing performance expectations or job duties after the work has already started, without proper justification or compensation, says a business blog. In politics: It can describe a situation where a political party or leader changes their position or priorities to suit their current needs, potentially misleading the public or undermining previous promises, reports Forbes. In everyday language: It's a negative term, implying unfairness and manipulation. People generally dislike when goalposts are moved because it creates a sense of instability and distrust.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 18 hours ago

I’ll let Google answer this one for you

Answer what? I wasn't asking you, I can see clearly you don't know what it means, which is why you're copy pasting walls of ai text (like a literal bot) to distract from the fact that you tried to invoke the phrase where it wasn't remotely applicable because you think of it as essentially a magic incantation.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s lemmy.dbzer0.com

Last interaction with one had them calling for genocide of all with dissenting opinions to dbzer0 🤮

You’ll want to block them and .ml

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

oh, ffs, you're being hysterical.

if you read that and think it's anything but satire, you're an idiot. which was why your comment was removed, and mine wasn't.