this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025

57 points (77.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33301 readers

1318 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

6) No US Politics.

Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world

TheSaneWriter@lemm.ee

Asudox@lemmy.world

lemmy_bot@lemmy.world

beefbaby182@lemmy.world

ModeratorCan@lemmy.world

neidu3@sh.itjust.works

asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev

candyman337@lemmy.world

candyman337@sh.itjust.works

Considering that AI is "hallucinating", and able to make up information that seems true based on what the model was trained on, what is the difference between current AI and the human brain? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 day ago by Arkouda@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

To elaborate a little:

Since many people are unable to tell the difference between a "real human" and an AI, they have been documented "going rogue" and acting outside of parameters, they can lie, they can compose stories and pictures based on the training received. I can't see AI as less than human at this point because of those points.

When I think about this, I think about that being the reason as to why we cannot create so called "AGI" because we have no proper example or understanding to create it and thus created what we knew. Us.

The "hallucinating" is interesting to me specifically because that seems what is different between the AI of the past, and modern models that acts like our own brains.

I think we really don't want to accept what we have already accomplished because we don't like looking into that mirror and seeing how simple our logical process' are mechanically speaking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

on the contrary, "temperature" is intentionally injected randomness in the process.

edit: which, to be clear] is not a good thing

[–] nebulaone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but a computer can never give you a truly random number, it always has to calculate it from something. But, to be fair, we can't be certain that humans can either.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True randomness can be done via specialized hardware. But I don't think that's a meaningful criteria to evaluate LLMs by in the first place here.

[–] nebulaone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would add an element of uncertainty and mutation.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

For all practical purposes, PRNGs are uncertain. True quantum randomness really only matters for cryptographic security, it's not important here.