this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
1373 points (98.1% liked)

Memes

51680 readers
1520 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world -5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's not history, but it's certainly theory. The study it's based on is through observations of reality. When comparing something to one of these books, we're testing their observations by comparing them to reality. Incidentally, it gets brought up a lot when an event, occurrence, or vector in society begins to resemble these books too closely.

Your hyperbole of people quoting books all being nazis, on the other hand, is very easily disproven.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"this is giving boss baby vibes" except actually trying to make a point out of it

Your hyperbole of people quoting books all being nazis

Only the dumbest fucking people pull this shit and you are as fucking stupid as can be measured

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Considering what you measure with, that doesn't have much meaning.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Explain to me how you think I'm measuring, fuckwit. You have a judgement on a thing, you should be able to articulate what that thing is, right?

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Badly; as someone who is culturally illiterate, lacks the skills of observation to make any determination (whether it be about myself or the subject of the world around us), is incapable of actually making any arguments, and so uses "colourful language" in a juvenile attempt to cover up their shortcomings.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The question I asked you was to explain the method by which I was making a judgement, which you presumed to know.

Can you answer it, stupid? Or are we going to get another paragraph about how you being snide is supposed to obscure the fact that you can't maintain a coherent thought throughout one of your posts?

Mister five subordinate clauses per sentence.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, I rest my case. You are a... pointless individual. I do hope you have better luck in real life than on the internet.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 days ago

No, you're a pointless individual because you literally have no point in this argument. I asked you for what your point was and you've done nothing but evade and insult. You're a vapid fucking idiot. See? I can actually stake a position.