this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
84 points (97.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33572 readers
1227 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm asking because an IMDb rating cutoff above 6.5+-5 seems to generally do a good job making sure I don't regret watching something. But what am I missing among the sub-6? I know they exist, but it is hard to select among seas of...bad movies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Robocop 2014

I think its extremely underrated.

I thoroughly enjoyed it, because out of all the sci-fi movies I've seen in the last two decades, this one has a very high likely chance of playing out exactly as indicated in the film.

We will blur the line between man and machine, and eventually have a identity crisis.

We will very likely see autonomous drone platoons being coordinated by a few or single human operator.

Those drones will likely be deployed in a military fashion first with push-back on deploying on home soil as a police force.

Until they will inevitably be deployed and used against civilians.

Also kudo's to the scene where he is stripped down to the bare parts, and the entire theater went quiet. There's a level of existential dread, when your 'being' is laid bare that the reality is... you... everything about you.... is just a small clump of grey matter.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This movie's main issue is that given the choice, I'd still rather watch the 1987 release. Like most remakes, it didn't exceed its predecessor enough to justify its own existence.

Gimme that 2012 Dredd though, that was sick.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah, the original was way more entertaining, agreed.

But the original didn't really touch on the Ghost in the Machine-esque nature of blurring that line between man/machine.

Also the premise that they did it just to have a 'mobile tank' on the streets of Chicago was meh....

The premise of the newer movie, where they had to have a hybrid person in to push the narrative to achieve public opinion/support to allow robotic drones to roam the streets so they can make that sweet military industrial complex money and keep the plebs in place?

Yeah.. way more believable, if not a direct prediction of exactly what is to come.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

DAMN that movie kicked ass. Definitely out did the Stalone ones and deserves a sequel or two for sure.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Haven't watched it, but I read it's pretty much a take for take remake of the original which was WAY better. The original is awesome.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Not sure where you heard that, it hardly has anything in common with the original besides the main character, general premise, and some themes. The tone, dialogue, most characters, and subplots are totally different.