this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

49847 readers
808 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
32
Recommendations for a source code hosting service (lemmy.ml)
submitted 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) by Charger8232@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am looking for recommendations for an open source self-hosted ~~version control system~~ source code hosting service. I found a few, but I can't decide on which one to pick:

If there's a better one than the ones I've listed here, I'd love to hear about it!

I care primarily about privacy and security, if that makes any difference.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Gogs is the original. Gitea is a fork because the dev of Gogs wasn't taking community input (I think that was the reasoning behind it). Forgejo is a fork of gitea because some folks didn't like gitea forming a for profit corporation (Or something to that effect).

As far as day to day use they're all fairly similar, though it's been a long time since I used Gogs.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's not just the for-profit corporation, there's also governance issues. Basically, the community elected certain positions and then had the rug pulled out from them such that no elections would be held again.

In the name of the Gitea Community who elected you last year, we welcome the creation of a for-profit company that allows you to make a living out of Gitea.

[...]

We believed you when you promised to pass along the ownership of the Gitea project to your elected successors. This promise is part of an essential bond between you and the strong Community of volunteers, as well as all those who rely upon our collective efforts.

With that in mind, you can understand our surprise when we learned on October 25th, 2022 that both the domains and the trademark were transferred to a for-profit company without our knowledge or approval.

Source.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 44 minutes ago

Thanks, I knew there was a bit more to it but hadn't followed it all that closely.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

IMO, the Gogs dev was correct. If you look at that community input and what Gitea became, I was glad to use the version that rejected it.

But I don't know how it compares with Forgejo.

[–] _cryptagion@quokk.au 5 points 7 hours ago

It’s Gitea with some security fixes and community input, as open source software should be.