this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

49847 readers
808 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am looking for recommendations for an open source self-hosted ~~version control system~~ source code hosting service. I found a few, but I can't decide on which one to pick:

If there's a better one than the ones I've listed here, I'd love to hear about it!

I care primarily about privacy and security, if that makes any difference.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 56_@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Those 3 are all fairly similar. Here are some others I can think of:

  • Gitlab: many features, complex, pr workflow.
  • Forgejo / Gogs: simpler, github inspired interface, pr workflow.
  • Radicle: peer to peer, idk much more...
  • Sourcehut: minimal (non-github) interface, very modular, email workflow.
  • Cgit / Gitweb / etc.: just a git interface, no specific workflow.

 

If you're not using any of the additional features, cgit should be enough. If you're planning on collaborating with others, probably Forgejo would be better.

You can also use individual components of sourcehut, if you want a git web interface with just issue tracking, ci, or wiki, for example.

[–] sun@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 hours ago

A pro of Sourcehut is that EVERYTHING can be done by email. So, if you use their issue tracker and want other people to be able to submit issues, they can do it without making an account.