this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
1036 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

73534 readers
3147 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 123 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Best of luck with that, idiots. How are you planning to tell the difference between my personal VPN and my work VPN?

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Next step: ban on remote work.

[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 8 points 3 days ago

It's not just remote work. All our manufacturing sites use to VPN connections data centres. It would cripple manufacturing on an epic scale if they were instabanned.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well we just fire you, and the one you’re still using then must be your personal one!

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He means, how is the government supposed to tell the difference between personal and work vpns.

[–] Darth_Lemmy@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago

he just answered your question. maybe read it again

[–] snowfalldreamland@lemmy.ml 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Either just banning remote work or more realistically you'll need a permit for running a vpn server. Permit pricing starting at 100k a year

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

How many small businesses can afford such permit? Hell, I'd argue that even bigger companies will have a problem paying for that.

Also, what if I just connect to a vps overseas and set my exit point there? Will they ban vps too? This is gonna be so much fun to see from the outside

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How many small businesses can afford such permit? Hell, I'd argue that even bigger companies will have a problem paying for that.

Feature, not a bug.

They want people back in offices to help landlords and property prices. This way they can say that remote work is not banned and it's just companies choosing not to buy a permit and offer it.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I work from office and i regularly use a vpn at work to connect remotely to devices that are not physically with me. Not to talk about companies that provide remote assistance and use them to connect to their customers devices.

Remote work is just a byproduct of vpns, but not the real reason why you use them at work.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You think given how well thought through this online safety act has been that they'll understand that would be an issue and legislate accordingly?

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely not, of course. I'm just hoping they try to enforce this so a shitstorm of proportions only seen in the brexit will ensue.

One thing we must acknowledge to these idiots is how much effort they put on showing the world the consequences of extremely stupid acts so the rest don't have to do it.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

how much effort they put on showing the world the consequences of extremely stupid acts so the rest don't have to do it.

Kinda sucks to be the world's policy alpha tester though.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

VPN ban risks pushback from their billionaire masters. Multinational corporations don't want to deal with anything that could hurt profits.

[–] Darth_Lemmy@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

yes everything will be banned and binned. better dust off that carrier pigeon

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago

They wouldn't consider such rational things

[–] Damage@feddit.it 5 points 4 days ago

What about the VPN I have to my home?