this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
748 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

77955 readers
2051 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 83 points 9 months ago (14 children)

"ROFL"

Signed, everyone who has been involved in migrating a codebase before.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 34 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Yep, months is a joke, doubly so when talking about tens of millions of lines of code and also COBOL specifically.

This is going to be a hilarious disaster but not so hilarious when people who need the benefits need them and won't be able to get them.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

To be fair. We assume "months" means less than 2 years. But 10 years can also be "months", and is probably a more realistic timeline.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Nobody is referring to 10 years as "months".

When you're talking about multiples of years, it's going to be called years, not months. They were obviously talking about a short timeline, less than 2 years, likely less than 1 year.

They have no idea what they're talking about.

Like I said, months is a joke.

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

So was what I said. I was presenting a hypothetical way they justify their ridiculous claims by doing something else ridiculous.

But conveying tone in text is difficult, so I'm not surprised you missed what I was going for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)