this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
42 points (88.9% liked)

Technology

4957 readers
115 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The article title is very click baity, but I found the actual discussion and reasoning for why this will happen and how it can be stopped to be thoughtful.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iii@mander.xyz 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

There's only 2 proposed problems in the article as far as I can tell. They're not novel ideas, and the author brings no new evidence:

  1. "AI"’s disruption of the labor market.
  2. "AI" as magnifier of existing problems: fake news, scamming, military applications, domestic surveillance.

2/10 would not recommend the article

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 16 points 4 months ago

I'm thinking that gizmodo is not a very good publication