this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
799 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

74055 readers
3349 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Microsoft is being sued by a man who feels cheated by the current plans to sunset Windows 10. He makes some good points, but I doubt he'll win.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rami@ani.social 2 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Can you tell me more about what secure boot does in this correct? (Assuming this isn't a joke)

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago (11 children)

If you don't enable SecureBoot then you can't install Win 11.

As a bonus, you won't be able to install the latest Call of Duty or Battlefield titles either.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Okay but you should enable secure boot on any device you want to keep any level of private data on. It's trivial to break into a device that doesn't have it enabled if you can physically access it. Laptops especially should have secure boot enabled.

[–] Evono@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The thing is on desktop pcs... If someone got physical access to it you don't want to... You got way bigger issues haha

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'd argue that you now have two major issues. Someone breaking into a house and stealing a desktop isn't unheard of. Full disk encryption with secure boot deployed will save you the headache of also having your identity/bank account/cc info stolen a few days later.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

... Secure boot has nothing to do with encryption and your data. Bitlocker can work without secure boot https://superuser.com/questions/1200958/does-enabling-bitlocker-require-secureboot

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I mean yeah that's why I made the distinction in my comment... Without secure boot you're still opening yourself up to a whole host of other attack vectors even if you have bitlocker enabled.

[–] Evono@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

I'd argue that 99,9% don't use full disk encryption cause it's Infact a performance degrading feature.

And there's nothing to be stolen , all my passwords are in a password manager , all important accounts including the password manager have 2fa.

If someone isn't a pw manager or 2fa it's all their fault honestly.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)