this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
470 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

74247 readers
4199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] FishFace@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The requirement to file accounts is not a tax. Call things what they are, not whatever you've decided they're similar to in your mind. To do is either confusing or dishonest, depending on whether people ultimately see through what you're doing or not.

Opposition to this on the basis of finances requires you to actually have some idea of the fiscal outcome. If the number of British children who end up bypassing the rules and viewing genuinely harmful material is small then it will result in lower costs from children traumatised, mentally ill or killing themselves.

I oppose the act because of incalculable costs to privacy, not because it might mean Facebook has to display 10 more ads to someone to maintain their profit margins.

[โ€“] Wooki@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Call things what they are, not a tax.

You should practice it.

Levy is a Tax.

opposition requires

Absolute bollocks. Doesn't require anything. It only requires personal opinion. Parliament runs on it.

Of course the privacy impact is huge. privacy just does not matter to the average working voting person trying to put groceries on the table.

MPs wont change the stance here because people want to be protected by anonymity. Frankly they won't change stance at all. Its a certainty at this point.

But it will increase the cost of business which will be passed on and definitely exploited.

"Wont somebody think of the children"

Plenty of children starving in the UK because Government services cant raise revenue to maintain existing levels of public services.

I look to the UK and see the future of western economies. Boned badly, society highly controlled with a large overall tax burden, years of immigration to keep the budget balaced on paper increasing the impact all to delay the fallout. And yes while this will most likely not register a blip to the CPI, its still yet another cut in the wrong direction.