this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
752 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

74545 readers
3975 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source of feedback form:

https://developer.android.com/developer-verification (bottom of page)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 117 points 2 days ago (13 children)

This is silly. Google doesn't give a single fuck. This decision will make money for key players and that's the end of the conversation.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's very likely that no amount of negative feedback will change anything. Why not waste some of their time anyway? Write to them, call them, spread the word. This is the only thing we can do. Even if it goes through regardless - at the very least we can make it as unpleasant as possible.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their AI will be looking over all of the responses, not people. No important person at Google’s time will be wasted on this.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's why keywords are important. For instance I added the fact that if they continue in this course I will seek to de-Google my phones.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Like I said in another comment, unless they get tens of millions of actual unique-not-spam responses they will not even consider reconsidering. People aren’t going to de-google in any great numbers from this, because most of the people this will affect are already de-googled.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Rather than degoogling telling them you will go to Apple and opt for apple services is likely the more powerful response, since that is what the regular person is more likely to do. If degoogled is used they'll likely dismiss it assuming it is just one of those niche nerds. But an exodus to Apple is a threat that is more realistic.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 17 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

But that makes no sense - they’ll go to someone who is even more restrictive in side loading?

Google won’t reverse this because there’s no alternative for the relatively few people this will affect. They already don’t use Google things, and Apple don’t accomodate them. They’ve got them by the balls and they know it, which is why it’s all just empty threats even from people in here.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No humans are involved in reviewing these. They go into the memory hole and that's that.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Assigned to: Some Indiandude (xWF)

load more comments (10 replies)